能量之海

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

纽曼的能源机
第十章 量子力学

  • 背景颜色
  • 文字颜色
  • 文字大小

本帖最后由 火凤凰 于 2014-8-21 09:06 编辑

未修订版本,待时间充裕再修订

Chapter   10QUANTUM MECHANICS

"We hope that the present fluctuationsof thinking are only Indication of an upheaval of old beliefs which in the endwill lead to something better than the mess of formulas which today surroundsour subject."
-Erwin Schrodinger
注:大意是说希望有新的思想结果现在混乱的公式体系。
25.Up to this point, I have been discussing the mechanical utilization of thebasic building entity of all matter: the "gyroscopic-action-entity.” Iwill now conceptually relate the behavior of this "gyroscopic-action-entity" to QUANTUM MECHANICS.
25.基于这一点,我已经讨论了构成物质的基本单元实体的力学利用:“陀螺仪效应实体”。我现在将在概念上将这种“陀螺仪效应实体”的行为和量子力学联系起来。
[NOTE:I will now be discussing other important concepts concerning the nature of thegyroscopic particle. I must add that there are those who may feel that I shouldhave published these other concepts in a separate book rather than combinetheir exposition with a presentation describing the nature of my energymachine. I disagree with anyone who may feel this way. The universal nature ofthe gyroscopic particles (more generally referred to as"gyroscopic-action- entities") which I have discovered is of fargreater significance than one, simple application of their utilization, i.e.,my energy machine. By combining these two intellectual areas, I wish tostimulate the mind of the reader to think beyond the limitations of thoughtimposed by the study of one technical application. I would prefer that thereader give more careful consideration to understanding a universal principle:the principle inherent in the nature and action of the gyroscopic particle!]
[注意:这现在将讨论另外关于陀螺子理论的重要概念。我必须添加这些内容,有些为觉得我应该在不同的书里发布这些概念,而不是和其它讨论能源机的阐述放在一起。这一点都不同意这种观点。已经发现的陀螺子(更多指“陀螺仪效应的实体”)的普遍理论远比一种它的一种应该,即我的能源机,要重要的多。通过结合这两块知识,我希望激发读者思想超越学习技术应用的限制。我更喜欢读者更关注于理解一种普遍的法则:陀螺子固有的理论和行为!]
A.    I will quote several passages from awell-written book entitled The Nature of Physics by Peter J. Brancazio ofBrooklyn College, City University of New York [published by MacMillanPublishing Company, Inc., New York, 1975). From page 585:
A.我将引用几段文字,来自于…:
WAVE-PARTICLEDUALITY
波料二相性
''Thediscovery that material particles exhibit wave characteristics adds a newdimension to the problem of wave-particle duality. The classical descriptionsof light as a wave and matter as composed of solid particles no longer seemvalid -for both matter and light have been found to display wave and particlecharacteristics. How can we provide a coherent explanation for these extremelypuzzling discoveries? One way to resolve the problem of wave-particle dualityis to assume that one or the other is more fundamental. There are two possiblealternatives:
材料粒子有波特性的发现给波料二相性问题增加了新的维度。经典的光是一种波、物质由实体粒子组成的描述好像不再有效-因为发现物质和光都有波和粒子特性。我们如何给这极让人困惑的发现一个明确的解释?一种解决波料二相性问题的方法是假定波或粒子是更基础的。这有两种可能的选择:
"(1)light and matter are ultimately composed of particles. Their wave propertiesderive from the group behavior of a large number of interacting particles.[This approach, it will be recalled, was unsuccessfully adopted by Einstein inan attempt to explain the behavior of light.]
(1)光或物质最终是由粒子组成。它们波的特性来自于大量相互作用的粒子的集体行为。[在爱因斯坦尝试解释光的行为时,这种方法没被他认可。]
"(2)Light and matter are ultimately composed of waves. The particle properties arethen derivative. One could hypothesize that 'particles' are reallyconcentrations of waves or perhaps stable condensations in an underlying fluidor field.
(2)光和物质最终由波组成。粒子特性之后被派生。可以假定“粒子”实际是由波或更基础的稳定液体或区域浓缩而成。
"Unfortunately,neither of these alternative hypotheses has been developed with any greatsuccess. Most modern-day physicists generally believe that neither particlesnor waves are more fundamental, but rather that they are two manifestations ofsome as-yet-unidentified (and possibly unidentifiable) entity.
不幸的是,两种假定都没有取得巨大成功。大多数当代科学家相信粒子或波都不是更基础的,而不是它们由一些未知的(也许无法辩认)实体表示。
注:意思是人们没想用一种更基础的粒子表示波料二相性,而是认定其一为另一个的基础。
"Ifthe beginning student has trouble understanding how an entity can possess bothwave and particle attributes at the same time, he or she may be comforted tolearn that most experienced physicists are just as disturbed by this problem.”
如果开始学习的学生在理解一个实体怎么同时有波和粒子特性时,他或她也许安慰你大多有经验的科学家也被这个问题困扰。
Quotingfrom The Nature of Physics, page 604:
引自The Nature of Physics,604页:
''Einsteinfirmly believed that underlying the quantum theory -perhaps on a sub quantumlevel -there had to be fully deterministic laws. In a letter to Max Bornwritten in 1926, Einstein summarized his position:
爱因斯坦坚定的相信在量子力学表面下-也许在一个次量子能级-有一个完全确定性的法则。在1926年给Max Born的信中,爱因斯坦总结到:
'Quantummechanics is very impressive. But an inner voice tells me that it is not thereal thing. The theory has much to offer ... but I am convinced that God doesnot throw dice. '
量子力学是非常深刻的。但一个内在的声音告诉我它不是真的。这种理论有太多先择,但我相信上帝不会掷色子。
"Atthe present time, nearly fifty years after the birth of quantum mechanics, theargument has not been settled. There is no evidence whatsoever that adeterministic sub quantum level exists. Nor is there any convincing evidence tosupport the orthodox interpretation. For example, no experiments have ever beenperformed on a single atom or electron to test the orthodox contention that thewave function describes the properties of a single particle rather than a groupof particles. Although the orthodox interpretation is generally accepted, thereremain a few who, like Einstein, believe that the mathematical formalism ofquantum mechanics is not the final answer. This attitude has been mosteloquently described by Erwin Schrodinger:
现在,量子力学诞生了大约50年,争论一直没停。没有任何证据说明一具确定性的次量子级存在。也没有任何令人信服的证据支持正统的解释。例如,没实验用一个原子或电子测试波函数描述的一个粒子而不是一群粒子的特性传统论点。虽然传统解释被普遍接受,仍然有少数人,如爱因斯坦,相信量子力学的数学形式体系不是最终答案。这种看法已经被Erwin Schrodinger充分说明:
'Manymaintain that no objective picture of reality is possible. However, theoptimists among us (of whom I consider myself one) look upon this view as aphilosophical extravagance born of despair. We hope that the presentfluctuations of thinking are only indications of an upheaval of old beliefs whichin the end will lead to something better than the mess of formulas which todaysurrounds our subject. '"
许多人依然坚持没有一种真实客观的构想是可能的。然而,我们之中的乐观者(我认为我自己是其中之一)看待这种观点为一种哲学上绝望的放纵。我希望当前思想的动摇只是表明一种旧思想的突变,最后领导我们得到比今天话题中混乱公式更好的结果。
B.  My work pays tribute to those thinkingindividuals such as Einstein, Schrodinger, Faraday, Maxwell, Newton, andothers. The sensitive and inquisitive mind will see that my work moreaccurately brings together the work of these impressive contributors for theadvancement of the human species. The effect of such intellectual"bringing together" is to generate a new "oneness" which ismore impressive and beneficial than the work of any single, great innovatoralone.
B.我有工作证明了这些人的想法,如爱因斯坦、薛定谔、法拉第、麦克斯韦、牛顿和其他人。敏感好奇的人将看到我的工作准确的将这些给人类带来进步的伟人的工作结合在一起。这种智慧的“结合”效应会产生一种新的“单一理论”,它比每一个改革者的工作都更深刻有益。
Letme begin by pointing out that the mathematical consequences of the Diracequation stipulates that the energy terms applied to a fourth quantum numberhaving two values, ( + 1/2) and ( - 1/2), are identical to thespin-quantum-number Ms which assigns to the electron an intrinsicspin and states that magnetism is a result of electron spin within thematerial. On the other hand, it has still been taught that a magnetic fieldcontains no kinetic energy -only potential energy -and that the "lines offorce" surrounding a magnet are imaginary. [This erroneous concept hasbeen taught in spite of the brilliant insights of Faraday and Maxwell!]
让我从指出一些事实开始,狄拉克方程数学结果规定能量级施加到第四量子数(?)有两个值,( + 1/2) 和 ( - 1/2),和自旋量子数Ms一致,确定电子内自旋并声明磁性是电子自旋带动内部物质的结果。另一方面,依然被告知磁场不包含机械能-只有潜在能量-并且磁体周围的“力线”是想像的。[这个错误的观念已经被教授,尽管法拉第和麦克斯韦已经洞悉。]
注:1928年英国物理学家狄拉克(Paul Adrien MauriceDirac)提出了一个电子运动的相对论性量子力学方程,即狄拉克方程。利用这个方程研究氢原子能级分布时,考虑有自旋角动量的电子作高速运动时的相对论性效应,给出了氢原子能级的精细结构,与实验符合得很好。从这个方程还可自动导出电子的自旋量子数应为1/2,以及电子自旋磁矩与自旋角动量之比的朗德g因子为轨道角动量情形时朗德g因子的2倍。电子的这些性质都是过去从分析实验结果中总结出来的,并没有理论的来源和解释。狄拉克方程却自动地导出这些重要基本性质,是理论上的重大进展。
Youwill discover in this Book that the essence of Magnetism, Electricity, Gravity,Inertia, Planetary Motion, Thermodynamics, and a New Source of Energy andMatter are all mechanically explained by the nature of a"gyroscopic-action-type-particle." It was long after I had developedmy concepts that I discovered my "mechanical” explanation correlatedprecisely with Dime's concept of mathematical spin. The reader should find iteasy to advance from quantum mechanics to the mechanical essence of all matterconsisting of the gyroscopic-action-entity which I present in this Book.
你将在本书中发现,磁力、电力、重力、惯性、行星运动、热力学、能量和物质的新来源都可以通过‘陀螺仪效应粒子’的理论力学解释。在我发展我的概念很久以后,我发现我的“力学”解释精确的符合Dime的数学旋转的概念。读者应该发现,它比量子力学更容易得到我呈现在本书中由陀螺仪效应实体组成的所有物质的力学本质。
"... the essence of Magnetism, Electricity, Gravity, Inertia,Planetary Motion, Thermodynamics, and a New Source of Energy and Matter are allmechanically explained by the nature of a 'gyroscopic, action-typeparticle.'"
“…磁力、电力、重力、惯性、行星运动、热力学、能量和物质的新来源都可以通过’陀螺仪效应粒子’的理论力学解释.
Agyroscopic action is the "mechanical” essence of a ''spin. '' I will nowpresent many (seemingly unrelated) scientific facts which I examined years ago forthe purpose of testing the truth of my Hypothesis and ascertaining if myHypothesis could explain other scientific observations for which there was no"mechanical" understanding.
陀螺仪效应是“旋转”的力学本质。我将展示许多(看似无关)的科学事实,这是我多年前为检测我的假说真实性的收集的,确认是否我的假说可以解释其它不能用“力学”理解的科学发现。
D.If we do not have a unified, "mechanical” understanding of the essence ofall matter, then what we physically "see" as an outsider to mattercan be very deceiving.
D.如果我们没有一个关于物质本质统一的“力学”理解,那么我们作为一个物质外的旁观者“看”到的是非常有欺骗性的。
EXAMPLE:(See Figure25-D1.)
001.jpg (102.28 KB, 下载次数: 33)

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|能量之海

GMT+8, 2017-7-24 02:33 , Processed in 0.109864 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.3 Licensed

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.. 技术支持 by 巅峰设计