Iwill now present an explanation for a working invention which utilizes theenergy within magnetic fields and produces more energy than is introduced intothe system from an external energy input. Do not at this point reflect poorlyupon yourself and blindly state "perpetual motion." Simply put, thetechnological process which I will discuss converts mass into energy on a 100%conversion process via E = MC2.
14. I believe it is imperative toreiterate that the energy in any magnetic field is the energy which composesthe elements of the atom and is literally Einstein 's Equation of E = MC2. Suchenergy in the form of gyroscopic particles is the basic building block of allmatter and provides the basis for the conceptual interface between energy andmatter.
Thefollowing facts will clearly demonstrate a fundamental understanding whichprepares the reader for a more thorough comprehension of how one technologicalembodiment of this Pioneering Invention can be built.
Byplacing an iron core within a copper coil (as in Figure 14-B3) and turning thecurrent on, a significantly stronger magnetic field will be generated than inFigure 14-B1 [for the same energy input]. Now, turn off the current as inFigure 14-B4 and there will be a small, remnant magnetic field surrounding theiron core. If a magnet is placed near the iron core, the magnet will be visiblyaffected. However, one is easily deceived by these tests and can be misleadinto believing that copper is non-magnetic. This is exactly what happened toHans Christian Oersted in 1820 when he first discovered that an electriccurrent produced a magnetic field which would cause a magnet to align at rightangles to the conducting wire. Oersted noted that the deflection of the magnetlasted only as long as the current was flowing through the conducting wire andhence, such magnetic action could not be caused by the (copper) wire, but mustbe a result of the current itself. This same incorrect conclusion is stillrigidly taught to this day.
Thefollowing facts will clearly prove that copper is bigbly magnetic relative tothe speed of atom alignment/unalignment as well as the action /reaction effectof the energy release (in the form of the gyroscopic particles previouslydiscussed) from the atoms comprising the copper wire!
Physicallyspeaking, this simply means that the energy contained within the magnetic field- when generated by positive (+) current flow in one direction - is returned bythe collapsing magnetic field as negative ( -) current flow when the currentflow reverses direction.
Thefacts demonstrate the following: 14C above shows that if one inputs a givenamount of current (X) into a copper coil during a given-instant of time then,as described in I4D above, the same amount of current (X) outputs from thecopper coil during the same instant of time. In addition, 14C above also showsthat if the current is then cut off and the coil shorted with meters in theline, then the same amount of current (X) will now come from the copper coil.
Thefacts therefore demonstrate: (X) current in and(X) current out plus (X) currentout again when the (X) current input is stopped. These facts are thereforeequivalent to 1 (X) amount of current into the coil (copper) and 2 (X) amountof current out of the (copper) coil.
Thefacts clearly demonstrate that in Figure 14-E1 , one "gallon" of currentcame from the copper coil Itself and most definitely not from the initial one"gallon" of current put into the copper coil. (This is an analogyonly. The mass or volume of the electric current input or output cannot be seenor weighed because it is composed of gyroscopic particles and is the mechanicalessence of E = MC2.)
EvenI was mislead by these teachings for many years, and I finally came to therealization that copper was highly magnetic by a completely different meansthan outlined above. These means included: (1) my general comprehension whichoriginated with my recognition that the basic building block of all mattermatter was the gyroscopic particle , and (2) a test I conducted using a singlepiece of copper wire 800 feet long, which was doubled-back 400 feel to the startingpoint and hooked to a meter and dry cell battery. (See Figures 14-Fl and14-F2.)虽然我也被这些常说误导了很多年，最终我认识到铜是有很强磁性的，和上面概括的完全不同的方式的磁。这包括：（1）物质的基石是陀螺子的原始认知，（2）一个我设计的实验，只用了800英尺长的铜线和一节干电池，铜线有400英尺折叠回来到起点，连接到仪表和干电池。
Thetest shown in Figure 14-F1 has the parallel positions of the wire 10 feetapart, with no "Unobvious Force" between the parallel portions of thewire. The test shown in Figure 14-F2 has the parallel portions of the wireextremely close, with an "Unobvious Force" between the parallel paresof the single wire.
Theresults of these two tests demonstrated the same current input for both tests.Prior to these results I had recognized that the words "Work ,""Force," and "Power " are implicit engineering statementsand do not represent precise, scientific terms based upon observational reality. I conceptually altered such macroscopic, engineering statements to"Obvious work," "Obvious Force," and "Obvious Power.'I would microscopically describe what occurs internally, with in matter as"Unobvious Work," "Unobvious Force," and "UnobviousPower. " (I will explain these concepts later in this Book.) Such semanticclarification enabled me to know - upon completing the above tests in Figures14-Fl and 14-F2 -that copper is extremely magnetic.
Ishould add that there is an important conceptual distinction between twomeanings of the word "efficiency." To state that a given invention is8.2 efficient, i.e., it produces over eight times as much energy as itconsumes, is different from stating that the invention is 100 percentefficient, i.e., it completely converts the gyroscopic particles within themagnet from "magnet mass " to electrical energy. The former processinvolves production efficiency and the latter process involves conversionefficiency.
15. Now to discuss the practical usage for thisnew understanding of the gyroscopic particles which are the mechanical essenceof the equation E = MC2 and comprise the component parts of theatoms within all matter, conductors, and copper. By understanding the teachings(of this Pioneering Invention), one can build a physical embodiment of thisPioneering Invention by using a conducting coil which will produce more energyout of the system than that put into the system from an outside source such asbattery, generator , etc.现在讨论关于陀螺子新理解的实际应用，陀螺子是E = MC2等式的力学本质，是所有物质、导体和铜的原子的组成部分。通过理解教学（关于这个开创性发明），可以建造一个这个开创性发明的物理实现，通过用一个导体线圈输出多于输入系统的能量，输入能量来自外部电源如电池，发电机等。
Iwish to thank Dr. Roger Hastings, Senior Physicist for Sperry-Univac, forcalculating by conventional mathematics the quantitative measurements for the followingtest which I had proposed. Dr. Hastings is an exceptional scientist who had thecharacter to come forth in my behalf when many others were fearful orclose-minded.
For"mind-opening purposes" (to use the current vernacular) carefullystudy the following two tests:
A. Take 40-gauge copper wire whichhas a resistance of 1,049 Ohms for 1000 feet with a total weight (of atomscomposed of gyroscopic particles) of a mere .02993 lbs., turning same into acoil with a 10-foot interior diameter and 8.32 feet in height. One wouldtherefore have approximately a mere 31.8 turns of copper wire (copper atoms,i.e., gyroscopic particles). (See Figure 15-A.)用电阻为1049欧40-gauge的铜线（总重由陀螺子组成的原子0.02993磅1000英尺长）（gauge是一个单位，40-gauge应该不到2mm），绕制成10英尺内直径8.32英尺高的线圈。这将大约仅仅31.8圈铜线。（看图15-A）
If100 volts is connected to coil 15-A, then a current flow of approximately 95MAwould occur with total power input of 9.5 watts and a resulting weak, magneticfield of .012 Gauss or a mere .0000 14 Joules of energy stored in this weak,magnetic field.
如果100伏特连接到15-A中的线圈，之后产生一个大约95MA（100/1049＝0.0953A）的电流，总能量输入是9.5瓦特，导致一个微弱的0.12高斯的磁场或仅仅.0000 14焦耳(1/2*L*I ^2)的能量存储在这个弱磁场中。
Aninsignificant current flow would now occur if the current input was stopped andcoil 15-A was shorted-out to collapse a weak magnetic field and provide aninductance of only .003 Henries.
Aphenomenally larger current flow would now occur if the current input wasstopped and coil 15-B was shorted-out as a result of the collapsing, muchgreater magnetic field of the 5-gauge wire in coil 15-B. Such shorting wouldgenerate an inductance of 25,700 Henries, which is better than 8 million timesthe inductance of the 40-gauge coil in Figure 15-A above.
Clearly,these facts - combined with the above FACTS 1 through 14 - prove beyond anydoubt that Oersted's conclusion in 1820 (which is still taught to this day):"that the magnetic field came only from the current and not theconductor" to be totally false. [Although his conclusion is incorrect, Iremain grateful to Hans Christian Oersted for being the first to notice andattempt to explain an observed connection between an electric current and amagnetic field.)
Whencoupled with FACTS 1 through 14, tests 15-A and 15-B clearly prove that the phenomenaldifference in strength for the resulting magnetic fields (implying greatdifferences in stored energy) and additional current flow when the inputcurrent was stopped (inductance), had to come from the gyroscopic particlescomprising the component parts of the atoms within the copper coil.
Thecurrent flow input was the same in both tests, but the number of atoms (lbs. ofcopper) varied considerably from test 15-A to test 15-B correlating preciselywith the phenomenal difference in the strength of magnetic fields produced, theextreme difference in the stored energy (gyroscopic particles), and the greatdifference (inductance) in the additional current flow produced when the inputcurrent was stopped in test 15-A and test 15-B. These phenomenal differencesrepresent the mechanical essence of E = MC2: gyroscopic particles.
Allof the above FACTS 1 through 15 scientifically establishes the position thatthe mathematical formulas employed in the calculation of the energy within amagnetic field (intended to represent the potential energy or stored energy ofJoules in a magnetic field) are totally incorrect. The FACTS above clearlyindicate that the magnetic field consists of gyroscopic -type particles whichare the mechanical essence of E = MC2 and represent an orderly flowof kinetic energy.
Iwill go further and stare that "potential" energy, as such, does notexist! All energy is kinetic in nature, since the gyroscopic particlescontinue, under all conditions, to move and spin at the speed of light inaccordance with E = MC2.
Theabove FACTS prove beyond question that the proper mathematical equation(concerning the "kinetic" energy which makes up a magnetic field) musebe relative to E = MC2. A proper mathematical equation wouldrecognize that the "Unobvious Force "produced represents the Joulesof the "Unobvious Power' activated at that instant-in-time and as so usedwould diminish the mass of the source of the magnetic field via a 100% utilization(conversion efficiency) of Einstein’s Equation E = MC2, since the magneticfield consists of kinetic energy having a gyroscopic action which representsthe mechanical essence of E = MC2.
''... the magnetic field consists of gyroscopic-type particles whichare the mechanical essence of E = MC2 and represent an orderly flow of kineticenergy. "
Ileave the task of determining the nature of such equations to a thinking,questioning mathematical mind, as I do not have the mathematical expertise. Itshould be noted, however, that -the mechanical comprehension of a naturalphenomenon has often historically preceded a mathematical model. James ClerkMaxwell acknowledged the importance of Michael Faraday’s mechanical andexperimental abilities.
Maxwellalso recognized that such mechanical aptitude constituted a major intellectualinput to his later mathematical theories. In his paper 'On Faraday's Lines ofForce,' read before the Cambridge Philosophical Society on December 10, 1855and February 11, 1856, Maxwell explicitly stated his debt to Faraday:
"Themethods are generally those suggested by the processes of reasoning which are foundin the researches of Faraday, and which, though they have been interpretedmathematically by Prof Thomson and others, are very generally supposed to be onan indefinite and unmathematical character, when compared with those employedby the professed mathematicians. By the method which I adopt, I hope to renderit evident that I am not attempting to establish any physical theory of ascience in which I have hardly made a single experiment, and that the limit ofmy design is to shew bow, by a strict application of the ideas and methods ofFaraday, the connexion of the very different orders of phenomena which he hasdiscovered may be clearly placed before the mathematical mind. "*
A. In 1979, I filed a patent forthis Pioneering Invention of which several embodiments have been taught and disclosedsince that time. The use of a conducting coil is one of those embodiments andthe original parent and continuing patent applications were filed before anyphysical prototypes based on the Theory were built. The physical prototypeswere thereafter built for the benefit of others, not for myself, since I knewsuch prototypes would operate as I had predicted. Scientifically, one shouldfind pertinent the fact chat when these prototypes were constructed, theyperformed exactly as I had conceptually predicted in the patent applicationsfor this Pioneering Invention.
Seebelow picture 15-C1 featuring one of these early prototypes utilizing 5-gauge,insulated copper wire with a total weight of approximately 4,200 lbs. of copperatoms (or over two tons), 300 lbs. of No. 30
Gaugecopper wire (atoms) wrapped over the outside of the 5-gauge wire (atoms), and apermanent magnet containing approximately 600 lbs. of atoms (or slightly lesschat 1/3 of a ton). [l am deliberately referring to the wire as"atoms" and describing the magnet as 600 lbs. of "atoms" inorder to accustom the reader to a mechanical perspective concerning the natureof the action of the gyroscopic particles contained within all atoms.]
Themassive, permanent magnet had an approximate 20-inch diameter and was slightlyless than 4 feet long. The large, conducting copper coil had an approximate l.D of 4 feet, was approximately 3 feet in height, and was wrapped upon a largefiberglass tube. The total weight of the system was approximately 5,000 lbs.大永磁体有一个大约20英寸的直径，刚不到4英尺长。大铜导体线圈大约4英尺直径，大约3英尺高，绕在大玻璃纤维管上。系统总重大约5000磅。
Thephotographs shown in 15-C1 simply represent a primitive, handmade prototype made(in the backwoods of Lucedale, Mississippi, by me and my lovely, devotee! wife)to prove to others that the Technical (Theoretical) Process which l originallydeveloped and taught is correct. I consider the Technical Process to be 10,000times more important that the primitive working prototypes.
Withonly 1.5 watts input, the back power (emf) produced would generate a spark atthe commutator of such heat magnitude that the back power would, in 2 shortperiod of time, explode and destroy a ceramic insulator from a 5-watt resistorplaced on the commutator at the point of current reversal. Dr. Roger Hastingsestimated the back emf to be in excess of 80,000 watts.
Therotating, handmade, 600 lb. (of atoms), 4-foot magnet permitted a slow RPM. At200 RPM it was calculated by others that the centrifugal force would be 10,000lbs. of force attempting to pull the magnet apart.
Everyonewho initially viewed the massive unit in 15-C1 above was then asked thequestion: "Based on your expertise, how much power would be necessary tosimply operate this device mechanically?” Answer: from 200 to 1000 watts. Otherskilled individuals - upon learning that the unit had only copper in the coil -statedthat in their expert opinion, the unit would be highly inefficient since itcontained no iron core.
However,the facts pertaining to the unit's operation in 15-C1 do clearly prove that theunit could operate on less than 3/2 watts and that it was phenomenally efficient,i.e., far in excess of I00% production efficiency relative to the power out ofthe system compared to the external power into the system, and exactly 100%conversion efficiency relative to the conversion of the mass (gyroscopic particles)of copper atoms to electrical and rotational energy output.
Imust stress that this process is not "perpetual motion." Anyone whofollows my teachings is simply convening (on a 100% conversion efficiencybasis) mass into energy via a 100% (or more) production efficiency process.Therefore, the energy out of the total system is equivalent to the small amountof electrical energy input (acting as a pure catalyst) plus the extant magneticenergy (in the form of gyroscopic particles) within the system. Due to this lattercombination of energies, it may be said that the external energy output isgreater than the external energy input.
"The energy out of the total system is equivalent to the smallamount of electrical energy input (acting as a pure catalyst) plus the extantmagnetic energy (in the form of gyroscopic particles) within the system."
Iwill again turn to Dr. Roger Hastings (Senior Physicist with Sperry- Univac)who has conducted more tests on different occasions upon my working prototypesthan anyone else. I reemphasize the point that Dr. Hastings is an exceptionalscientist who has courage and the true scientific attitude. As a result, hecame forth in my behalf when many others were frightened or close-minded.
Theverification of the operation of the unit in 15-C1 above, as well as ocherprototypes, and rile qualitative scientific ability and fortitude of Dr. Hastingsare clearly demonstrated via the test described in Chapter Five. Such a healthy,scientific attitude is even more exemplified by the fact that Dr. Hastings wenton record as having once had the attitude that, before he traveled to Lucedaleto meet me, to listen to my concepts, and co conduct tests, he was of the beliefthat he would be confronting a "crack-pot inventor." Fortunately, Dr.Hastings' skepticism was tempered with genuine curiosity. I have discovered thatwithout such curiosity, skepticism will rapidly decay into cynicism.
Dr.Roger Hastings' statements and tests follow.